Alignment

Principle

TKR Varus Implant

 

Correct alignment and soft tissue balancing

- two of the most important aspects of successful TKR

 

Technical Goals

 

1.  Restoration of mechanical alignment

- forces of the leg pass through the centre of the hip, knee and ankle

- allows optimal load share through medial and lateral sides of the prosthesis

 

2.  Preservation / restoration of joint line

 

3.  Balanced ligaments

 

4.  Maintaining or restoring normal Q angle

 

Malalignment 

 

Post operative mechanical limb axis within a range of 180 +/- 3o

- associated with lower rates of aseptic loosening

 

Rand and Coventry 1988

- 90% 10 year survival 180 +/- 4o

- 71-73% when deviation > 4o

 

Creates a net varus or valgus moment

- excessive stress on one side of the knee

- excessive wear

- early failure

 

TKR Varus Tibial ImplantTKR Valgus Femoral ImplantVarus TKR early wear

 

Axis

 

1.  Coronal Plane

 

Mechanical Femorotibial axis

- centre of femoral head to medial tibial spine

- medial tibial spine to centre ankle

- should be a straight line 180o +/- 3o

 

Anatomic Femorotibial axis

- anatomic axis of femur and tibia

- should be 6o +/-3o

 

Anatomical Axis Femur (AAF)

- centre of femoral medullary canal to midpoint whiteside's axis

- usually exits at intercondylar notch

- entry point for IM rod of femoral jigo

 

Mechanical Axis Femur (MAF)

- centre of femoral head to centre of knee joint

 

Valgus cut angle

- angle between femoral and mechanical axis

- LL standing AP

- usually between 5 and 7o

- if cut the distal femur at the valgus cut angle, will place the femoral prosthesis mechanically neutral

 

Mechanical AxisAnatomic AxisAnatomic Axis Femur

 

Short patients -  > 7o

Very tall patients - < 5o

 

Anatomical axis Tibia (AAT)

- centre of tibia to proximal joint line

- normally 3o varus

- medial proximal tibial angle 87˚

 

Mechanical Axis Tibial (MAT)

- centre of tibial spines to centre of weight bearing axis of the distal tibia

- usually same as AAT

- except with traumatic or congenital bowing

 

Mechanical Axis TibiaMedial Proximal Tibial AngleProximal Tibial Slope

 

2.  Sagittal Plane

 

Posterior slope

- proximal tibia 10° posterior slope in sagittal plane

- in the knee this is reduced by the menisci

 

3.  Femoral Rotation

 

Preferred rotational alignment of the femur is slight external rotation to the neutral axis

 

2 reasons

 

1.  Restores Q angle and normal patella tracking

 

2.  Balances the flexion gap 

- proximal tibia normally in slight varus of 3o

- the tibial cut is made at 90o

- perpendicular to the mechanical axis

- the distal femoral cut is made 90o to the axis

- these two cuts match up in extension

- to maintain a symmetric flexion gap, the femoral component must be externally rotated by the same amount

- in flexion, the tibia has been ER by 3o to 90

- must do so to the femur

- allows balanced ligaments in flexion

 

Methods of establishing neutral rotational axis of the femur

 

1.  Leo's Line / Whiteside's axis 

- AP axis of the femur

- line running down the centre of the trochlea to the top of the intercondylar notch

- centre of trochlea groove to centre intercondylar notch

- AP cut is made perpendicular to this axis

 

2.  Epicondylar axis 

- only landmark available in revision

- place femoral component parallel to the epicondylar axis

- AP cut is made parallel to this axis

 

3.  Posterior condylar axis

- line connecting bottom of medial and lateral posterior condyles

- AP cut is made in 3o of external rotation to this line

 

Effects Internal rotation Femur

 

1. Unequal flexion extension gaps

- alters relative dimensions of posterior condyles in flexion

- tight medially

- loose laterally

- discomfort 

- limited flexion

- accelerated poly wear

 

2.  Lateral patella tracking

 

3. Anterior medial femoral notching

 

4.  Tibial Rotation

 

Internal rotation of tibial component

- relative external rotation of tibial tubercle

- increase the Q angle

 

Alignment and Resection Methods

 

Most systems use Classic Alignment & Matched Resection 

- cut tibia and femur perpendicular to MA

- ER femur 3°

- balance soft tissues

 

Two alignment methods

 

1.  Classic method alignment

 

Insall

- matching mal-alignments by 3°

- joint lines cut perpendicular to MA

- tibia cut in neutral / over-resect lateral tibial plateau

- femoral cut in 3° varus

 

Problem

- in flexion the lateral flexion gap is too large & trapezoidal

 

Overcome by ER femur 3°

 

2.  Anatomic alignment

 

Technique

- cut 9° to the femoral shaft

- corrects for 3° malalignment in flexion gap 

- have to use in conjunction with Matched Resection Method

 

Two resection methods

 

1.  Matched resection method

 

Technique

1.  Bony resection first

2.  Ligament balancing 

 

Advantage

- avoids problems of excessive bone resection to balance contracted capsule in Flex / Ext Gap Method

- the intact femoral condyles is the distal reference femur

- posterior LFC is the AP Femoral Reference

- preserves the joint line relative to the collaterals 

 

2.  Flexion extension gap resection method

 

Insall

- cut tibia perpendicular to mechanical alignment

- automatically ER femoral component 3° by IR femur 3° with Tensioner in flexion gap

 

Advantage

- again matched mal-alignments 

- usually gives good result if not severe deformity / contracture

 

Problems

A. Capsule contracture causes excessive bone resection

- carefully address this prior 

- post capsule contracture leads to excessive distal femoral resection

- are stable in extension, unstable in flexion

B. Mid flexion instability can result

C. The joint line is not fixed, its position is relative