Surgical Technique Varus Knee

Goal TKR Varus OA

 

Pain relief combined with a balanced range of motion, strength & stability

 

Indications

 

Painful arthritic knee

- OA

- RA

 

Functional limitation

 

Ideal Patient

- > 65

- thin

- low functional demands

- no major medical illnesses

- not a candidate for HTO

- failed non operative management

 

Absolute Contraindications

 

Active sepsis

Inadequate soft tissue cover

PVD

°Extensor mechanism

Charcot 

 

Relative Contra-indications

 

Previous osteomyelitis

 

Young patient

 

10% 7 year revision rate < 55 in AJR

 

Poor medical condition

 

Obesity

 

Winiarsky JBJS 98

- infection 10% vs 2%

- wound complications 20%

 

Samson et al ANZ J Surg 2010

- systemic review of TKR in obese (BMI > 30)

- significantly increased risk of wound complications and deep infections

- no weight loss post TKR

 

Bilateral TKR

 

Fabi et al J Arthroplasty 2010

- increased transfusion rate

- 2.1 x increased complication rate in bilateral group

- increased complication rate in patients > 70, obese and pre-existing respiratory condition

 

Patient Examination

 

1.  Previous scars

 

2.  Sagittal plane deformity

 

A. FFD

- increase distal femoral resection by 2 mm

 

B. Flexion range

- limited flexion range may make exposure difficult

- consider extensile exposure options

- will also decrease post operative flexion range

 

C.  Recurvatum

- rare

- fill the extension gap

- will then often have limitation of flexion

- lengthen quadriceps

 

3.  Coronal plane deformity

 

Varus / valgus deformity

- ? passively correctable to neutral

 

4.  Stability

 

MCL pseudolaxity

- due to loss of medial joint space

- varus knee

 

LCL pseuolaxity

- due to lateral joint space loss

- valgus knee

 

5.  Assess PFJ

 

6.  Extensor mechanism

 

Ensure intact / no patellectomy

 

7.  Hip

 

Stiff hip (OA, RA)

- may need to address hip first

- need good flexion for TKR

 

Fused hip

- need to do TKR over end of bed

- in order to hyperflex knee to access tibia

 

8.  Foot deformity

 

Valgus foot puts valgus strain on TKR

- correct foot deformity

- or final tibio-femoral angle 2o varus rather than 7o valgus

 

9.  Pulses

 

A.  Non palpable, present on doppler

- proceed, no tourniquet

 

B.  Diabetic, non palpable or non detectable on doppler

- vascular consult

 

Xray

 

Full length standing AP X-rays

- calculate valgus cut angle

- difference between MAF and AAF

- allows assessment of any femoral or tibial deformity

 

AP and lateral x-rays

- template femoral and tibial implant sizes

 

Lateral xray

- look for patella baja (may make exposure difficult)

 

TKR Preop Patella BajaPatella Baja

 

Evaluate deformity

- need for constraint

- need for augments

- need for stems

 

TKR Severe Varus Requiring Medial AugmentTKR Excessive Medial Osteophyte

 

Pre-operative workup

 

Bloods / CXR / ECG if over 50

- medical and anaesthetic review

- swabs of groin, nose, axilla to exclude MRSA colonisation

- M/C/S of urine

- chlorhexidine showers on morning of OT

 

Equipment

 

Stems, augments and range of sizes

- correct side

- all cutting jigs available

 

Surgical Approach

 

Set up

 

Supine on table

- laminar flow

- space suits

- minimal traffic

- IV Abx, shave in OT

 

High tourniquet (if palpable pulses)

- padding underneath to distribute pressure

- wide cuff better (1.2x leg diameter)

- no prep under tourniquet

- exsanguinate first

- no evidence increases risk of DVT

 

Foot on bolster

- lateral support

- need to be able to hyperflex knee

 

Alcoholic chlorhexidine

 

Problematic previous incisions

 

1.  Longitudinal

- use if possible

- leave wide bridge if impossible (>7cm)

- if choice, always use most lateral incision

- blood supply to skin flap comes from medial

 

2.  Transverse

- intersect at 90°

 

3.  If concerned, sham incision 2/52 prior

 

Approach

 

Midline anterior longitudinal skin incision

 

Above patella to tibial tuberosity

- don't go below TT

- avoid injury to infrapatellar branch of saphenous

 

Full thickness skin and subcutaneous flap

- above superficial retinaculum

- expose VMO, medial patella and patella tendon

 

Options

 

1.  Medial parapatellar approach

 

Along medial border of patella tendon, patella 

- leave fascial flap along VMO for repair

- leave flap along side patella

- don't go into muscle

 

2.  Mid-vastus

 

Flex knee to place VMO under tension

- divide in midsubstance

 

Nestor et al J Arthroplasty 2010

- RCT of midvastus v medial parapatella

- mild increase strength at 3 weeks

- no other benefit

 

3.  Subvastus

 

Preserves extensor mechanism

- elevate VMO off medial intermuscular septum

 

Jung et al Int Orthopedics 2009

- subvastus v medial parapatella

- earlier SLR and better flexion at 10 days with subvastus

 

4.  Lateral approach 

- valgus knee > 20°

 

Evert patella

 

Flip laterally

- homan / ring handled spike retractor inside to hold

 

Can just create a lateral pocket in fat and slide patella

 

Extensile Approaches if cannot Evert Patella

 

1.  Quadriceps "Snip"

 

Extend medial parapatellar arthrotomy laterally 

- distally to proximal across rectus

- obliquely in superolateral direction

 

No real post operative changes in rehab

- little loss of extensor power 

 

2.   Patella turndown (Insall)

 

Inverted V

- second incision 45o to medial incision

- dissection distally via tendon of VL & lateral retinaculum

- stop short of and preserve SLGA

- can convert to VY plasty

 

Repair with nonabsorbable suture 

 

Problems

- patella necrosis

- weakens extensor mechanism

 

Post op

- protect from flexion 2/52

 

3.  Tibial Tuberosity Osteotomy

 

Incision extended distally to expose proximal 10 cm tibia

- raise medial periosteal - osseous flap

- saw / osteotomes

- about 8 x 2 cm

- 1 cm thick

- leave attached laterally and hinge open

- reattached with wires or screws

 

TKR Tibial Tuberosity Transfer APTKR Tibial Tuberosity Transfer Lateral

 

Post op

- limit active extension

- limit passive flexion

 

In revision

- use wires that pass about stem

- 3 x wires

- 3 x drill holes in lateral aspect of bone hinge

- pass about stem

- 3 x drill holes in medial tibia

 

Soft Tissue Release

 

Removal ACL +/- PCL

Osteophytes debrided

Removal of meniscus

Removal of fat pad if further exposure required

 

Medial release

- knee in extension

- medial tibial periosteum is elevated 

- a narrow Hohmann retractor positioned subperiosteally around the medial border of the medial condyle

- residual periosteum is dissected posteromedially to the level of the insertion of the semimembranosus

- with increasing levels of varus will continue posterior and release SM

 

Bone Resection

 

Options

 

Advantage femur first

- makes the tibia easier to access

 

Advantage tibia first

- can mark on femur appropriate rotation of AP resection in flexion 

- can use tensioner / flexion extension gap resection method

 

Distal Femoral Resection

 

Theory

- the tibia is cut at 0o

- want residual tibiofemoral axis to be 3-7o

- therefore, instead of cutting femur at 7-9o valgus, cut at 5-7o

- matched malalignment

 

Lateral plane

- at right angles to anatomic axis

 

Alignment

 

A.  Intra-medullary best

B.  Extramedullary less accurate 

C.  Significant deformity of femur / THR

- may need to use EM / short IM / computer navigation

 

TKR and THR

 

Entry point

 

Clear osteophytes from intercondylar notch

 

Point

- 7 - 10 mm anterior to ACL

- slightly medial

- palpate femoral shaft

- pass IM drill reamer

- enlarge the hole to vent fatty contents

 

A. If entry too posterior 

- will flex the femoral component and limit extension

 

B.  If entry too lateral

- distal cut will be made in excessive valgus

 

TKR Valgus Femoral Implant

 

Place IM rod & distal femoral cutting Jig

 

Distal resection

 

Valgus angle

- pre-op valgus cut angle

- 0o to mechanical axis

- 5 - 7o from anatomical axis

- usually 5o tall and thin, 7o short and fat

 

Resection depth

- cut 8mm for resurfacing (thickness of femoral component) from most distal surface

- increase if FFD (10 mm)

- sets joint line

- the 8 - 10 mm will always be from the lateral side

- the thickness of the medial resection is > thickness of lateral resection

 

TKR Distal Femoral Valgus Cut

 

Joint line

 

Position

- 3 cm below medial femoral epicondyle

- 15 mm above fibular head

- at meniscofemoral ligament / mensical remnant

 

A.  Elevation of joint line

- excess distal femoral resection for FFD

 

Effect

- may need to use PS instead of CR to maintain flexion balance

- generates patella baja

- extension gap larger than femoral gap

 

B.  Lowering of joint line

- excessive tibial resection

 

AP Resection

 

A.  Anterior referencing

- measure from anterior down

- if between sizes down size

 

Advantage

- avoid notching

- avoid overstuffing PFJ

 

Disadvantage

- loose flexion gap from downsizing

 

B.  Posterior referencing

- posterior condyles up

- if between sizes upsize to avoid notching

 

Advantage

- stable flexion gaps

 

Disadvantage

- overstuff PFJ

- be aware of insufficient posterior condyles / IR

 

Size Femur with sizing guide

 

Clear synovium anteriorly

- seat feet of sizer on posterior condyles

- use stylus anteriorly

 

Note

- anterior or posterior referencing is built into jig

- both have feet to place on posterior femoral condyles

 

Between sizes

- up size

- move jig anteriorly appropriate amount

- avoids notching

- resects more posterior femoral condyles

 

Set Rotation of AP cutting block

 

Externally rotate femur

- normal patella tracking

- equal flexion extension gap

- should cut more off anterior aspect of lateral condyle than medial condyle

 

1.  Posterior Condylar Axis

- need to ensure no posterior deficiency or posterior condylar asymmetry 

- cutting block must be set 3o ER to this line

 

2.  Epicondylar Axis

- lateral epicondylar prominence and medial sulcus of the medial epicondyle

- set cutting block parallel to the epicondylar axis

 

3.  Whiteside's line

- Whiteside's line midline of trochlea

- most reliable

- should be 90o to epicondylar axis

 

Once size and rotation is set, drill holes for the cutting guide

- recheck the drill holes are on the appropriate axis

- ensure appropriate rotation

 

Anteriorly

- resect more lateral condyle than medial

 

Posteriorly

- resect more medial condyle than lateral

 

AP and chamfer cuts

 

Apply block

- ensure no anterior notching (femoral cortex proximal to trochlea)

- use angel wings to do so

- make anterior resection

- before posterior resection must protect LCL and MCL

- insert Homan retractors under collateral ligaments

 

PCL block resection

 

Separate Cutting Block

 

Medial / Lateral positioning important

- cover femur with component

- minimise overhang

- prefer to tend laterally for patella tracking

 

Resect box for femoral cam

 

Tibial Bone Cut

 

Alignment

 

Intramedullary guide

- less accurate with any tibial deformity

 

Extra-medullary guide

- most accurate

 

Extramedullary Alignment

 

Maximally flex knee

- retractors each side

- forked tongue, blunt homans retractor behind tibia to sublux forward

 

Centre jig at knee

- pin centre of interspinous eminence

- junction middle / medial two thirds tibial tubercle

- impact first pin on jig

 

Set rotation at knee

- rotate to tibial crest

- impact second proximal pin on jig

 

Tibial component rotation 

A.  Internal rotation of component

- will give valgus due to posterior slope

- results in tibial ER & increased Q angle

B.  Cut tibia when ER

- posterior slope creates varus

C.  Cut tibia when IR

- posterior slope creates valgus

 

Centre jig over talus

- line up with second MT

- halfway between medial malleolus and anterior fibula

- between EHL / EDL

- always tend to go towards medial malleolus to avoid varus which is most common mistake

- should align over tibial crest

 

Posterior slope

 

Normal posterior slope is 10o

- decreased by menisci to 3o

 

If tibia is cut at 90o, increased risk of tibial subsidence

- if flat poly design, cut at 10o

- if oblique poly design, can cut at less

 

Bone anteriorly is poor

- therefore usually wish to cut with a posterior slope to preserve anterior bone

- degree of posterior slope also built into poly

 

Check posterior slope

- usually built into cutting block

- ensure matches current slope

- use angle wings

 

Excessive posterior slope

- resects PCL origin

- loose in flex

- excessive metaphyseal resection

 

Anterior slope

- limited flexion

- decreased flexion gap

 

Set resection depth

 

Options

- resect 2 mm from worn side (medial)

- resect 10 mm from normal side (lateral)

- use stylus

 

Best to cut from lateral side

- have set joint line distally on femur from lateral side

- best to continue to do so from lateral side

- in a varus knee the medial joint line is worn

- lateral joint line is usually preserved

- enables preservation of anatomic joint line

 

Pin block in place

 

Pin in place 2 pins

- drill first

- prevents pins being divergent 

- allows adjustment of block

 

Double check tibial cut

 

Drop rod

- double check alignment

- ensure over centre of talus

- can adjust

- insert 3rd oblique pin

 

Recheck resection level with angel wings

- take more off lateral than medial

- ensure lateral side not more than 1 cm

 

TKR Tibial Cut

 

Over-resection

1.  Lowers joint line

2.  Poorer strength cancellous bone

3.  Decreased surface area

4.  Removes PCL / requires PS

 

Severe varus deformity

 

Problem

- 10 mm from lateral side does not take medial bone

- do not cut to level of medial defect as cancellous bone of the tibia becomes weak

 

TKR Severe Varus Requiring Medial Augments

 

Solution

- stay subchondral on lateral side

- never more than 10 mm cut lateral side

- build up medial side

 

Options

 

1.  Cement

 

2.  Autologous bone graft

- may have enough in primary

- from posterior or distal femoral condyles

- supplement with 2 screws

 

3.  Augments

- 5 - 10 mm

- use stems if use augments

- offsets forces to the diaphysis (up to 30%)

 

Cut tibia

 

1.  Protect MCL / LCL with retractors

2.  Protect NV structures

- anteriorly sublux tibia

- forked tongue / broad homan protecting posteriorly

3.  Protect patella ligament

- can cut lateral side with saw

4.  Protect PCL if CR

 

Clear posterior femoral osteophytes

 

Lift up femur / insert IM rod / push tibia posteriorly

- feel with finger

- curved osteotomes

 

Soft Tissue Balancing

 

Trial

 

Place trial tibia and femur

- trial poly (minimum 8 mm)

 

Coronal plane balancing

 

Tight in extension medially

- ensure all osteophytes released

- release semimembranosus

- release posterior half MCL

- release medial posterior capsule with curved osteotomes

- release pes

 

Tight in flexion medially

- release PCL

- release anterior MCL

 

Sagittal Plane Balancing

- trial flexion and extension gaps

- 6 possible problems (see TKR / Balancing)

 

Set rotation of tibia / prepare tibia

- ensure full medio-lateral coverage

- no medial overhang to avoid impingement

- can have some slight lateral overhang

- tend to have to compromise in the AP plane 

- should usually align with medial third of tibial tuberosity

- cut keel for tibia after ensuring correct rotation

 

Patellofemoral joint

 

1.  Not resurfacing

- remove osteophytes

- denervate

 

2.  Resurfacing

 

Onlay technique

- caliper measure thickness of patella

- aim to reproduce this with button

- size patella button

- each button size has an appropriate resection

- aim to leave minimum 15mm bone

- apply cutting jig

- ensure flat medial to lateral cut

- place button jig / medialise button / drill peg holes

 

Inlay technique

- caliper measure thickness patella

- size patella

- patella will have specific depth to drill

- ensure leaves adequate patella thickness above peg holes

 

Fixation and Closure

 

Prepare

 

Wash all surfaces

- H202

- dry with sponges

- good exposure of tibia

 

All components opened / checked / ready

 

Cementing

 

Antibiotic impregnated low viscosity cement (Palacos)

- 1 - 2 mixes

 

Tibial metal tray first

- pressurise into tibia

- insert tray, ensure correct rotation

- compress, even cement mantle

- clear all cement

 

Insert poly

- definitive / trial

 

Femoral component

- place cement on exposed surfaces, compress

- small amounts cements posterior femoral condyle area of femoral component

- impact, ensure not flexed

- remove excess cement

 

Extend leg / wait for cement to set

 

Insert definitive poly if used trial originally

- can retrial

- this step is difficult if using PS poly

 

Patella tracking

 

Check 

- one thumb technique

- flex and extend knee

 

Lateral retinacular release

- internal surface

- longitudinally

- protect SGA superiorly

- distally to lateral margin patella tendon

- proximally to just above superior patella

- not into vastus lateralis

 

Closure

 

Tourniquet release

 

Hersekii et al Int Orthop 2004

- RCT of tourniquet release to obtain hemostasis v tourniquet release after dressings

- increased blood loss with early release

- no difference in post op Hb, transfusion, operation or tourniquet times

 

Drain

 

Parker et al JBJS Am 2004

- meta-analysis

- using a drain increases transfusion requirement

- no difference in wound complications or infection

- more likely to need to augment dressings without drain

 

Closure

 

Water tight to prevent haematoma drainage

- 4-5 1 vicryl figure 8 sutures

- 1 vicryl locking suture

 

Post operatively

 

IV ABx x 4

 

Anticoagulation

 

Low dose LMWH that night or next day for 4 weeks

TEDS / SCD's

Early mobilisation

 

Analgesia

1.  Intra-articular analgesia

- combinations LA / NSAIDS

2.  Epidural

3.  Femoral nerve blocks / sciatic nerve blocks

4.  PCA

5.  NSAIDS

6.  Long acting oxycontin early

- aids wean off PCA

 

Physiotherapy

 

Immediate weight bearing and ROM

- quadriceps exercises

- can use splint until SLR

- need adequate analgesia

 

CPM

 

Advantage

- improves clearance of blood from joint

- reduces need for analgesia

- increases early ROM

 

Disadvantage

- no evidence improves outcome

- interferes with wound healing